![]() ![]() Both QNAP’s NetBak Replicator and Synology’s Data Replicator 3 could do both monitored (immediate) and scheduled backups. I’d tried the free ones that Synology and QNAP include with their products awhile back. The real work started when it came time to choose a backup application. And I was able to schedule a once-a-day incremental rsync backup of the QNAP to the Synology without a problem. QNAP’s 3.1.īut once QNAP gets around to issuing 3.2 firmware for its older Marvell-based products, the two will be equal enough. ![]() I probably should have swapped their roles, given the Synology’s higher performance and especially given Synology’s better backup features in its DSM 2.2 OS vs. Since the QNAP was already doing media serving, I decided to make it the primary NAS and use the Synology as an rsync backup target. But I didn’t have either of those on long-term loan from Iomega, while I did have the QNAP TS-109 Pro and a Synology DS109 on hand. But, to date, only Iomega has made the move and added the ability to back up to and from SMB shares to its ix4-200d and ix2-200. I’d been waiting for other NAS vendors to copy the ReadyNAS’ backup tricks, so that I could retire the NV and move to a speedier NAS. But I was just having a hard time breaking away from the NV ’s built-in backup capabilities. I had already moved its SqueezeCenter duties over to an old QNAP TS-109 Pro that I have on long-term loan. And the few backup apps that I’d tried were either too clunky, too slow or both.īut the NV had been acting kind of strange of late and it is pretty slow. I’d come to rely on the NV ’s ultra-flexible built-in backup capability, which can back up pretty much anything to or from anything else. The main thing that caused me to put off making a change was my reluctance to install a backup client on my main Windows-based work machine. But it did the job just fine as a network share that the NV ran scheduled backups to every few hours during each work day. The Linkstation is so old that it doesn’t even have any backup capability. But had I left two drives in and configured them in a single RAID 1 volume. Since my storage needs are under 100 GB (no, that’s not a typo!), I could easily have dropped down to a single 250 GB Seagate 7200.8 drive in the NV . But after a drive died on me, I decided to simplify and switch over to standard RAID. ![]() I originally started out with the NV in XRAID2. (See Smart SOHOs Don’t Do RAID.)īut here I was, using an aging NETGEAR ReadyNAS NV in RAID 1 as my main NAS and backing up to an even older Buffalo HD-H120LAN LinkStation. I’ve long been an advocate of avoiding RAID if possible and backing up one NAS to another for data security. But this past weekend, I finally made long-planned changes in the backup routine here at SmallNetBuilder. The first four bytes (DWORD) of the Data section contains the error code.Maybe it’s the approach of spring. Performance data for this service will not be available. The Open Procedure for service "BITS" in DLL "C:\Windows\system32\bitsp erf.dll" failed. Fix the errors and try the update again.Ĭontext: Application 'Search', Catalog 'index file on the search server Search' Error 1008 - Perflib: The update cannot be started because the content sources cannot be accessed. 18005, time stamp 0x49e023c7, faulting module wbengine.exe, version. I'm hoping the ones added below might help: Error 1000 - (100):įaulting application wbengine.exe, version. ![]() Regarding error messages - there is a lot of them. Regarding the points about JustCloud and Mozy above, we have tried to run the backup whilst these are disabled but the result is the same. We use managed anti-virus (managed via GFI remote management) ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |